For infrastructure owners, operators, and engineers
Screen the whole network. Inspect where it moves.
You are responsible for every kilometre; you can physically inspect only a fraction of them. Satellite radar treats the entire network consistently, reaches years into the past, and shows which sections justify engineering attention.
Asset types
Applications across the built network
- Roads
- Railways
- Bridges and approaches
- Pipelines
- Water networks
- Dams and reservoirs
- Industrial facilities
- Ports
- Airports
- Utilities
- Construction corridors
- Mining and extraction areas
How it helps
From network-wide screening to focused inspection
The workflow is designed around one economic fact: engineering time is scarce and expensive, and most of the network is not moving.
Define the network
Alignments, buffer widths, and priority structures — from GIS files or simple route descriptions.
Process the archive
Multi-temporal InSAR over the corridor: typically 100+ acquisitions spanning several years, in one consistent analysis.
Rank and report
Per-segment movement statistics, ranked sections, time series for flagged locations, and GIS deliverables for your systems.
Flagged segments come with their history attached: when movement began, whether it is steady, seasonal, or accelerating, and how it compares with adjacent stable sections. That context is what turns a flag into an inspection decision.
Repeated on a schedule, the same processing becomes a monitoring baseline — each new acquisition extends the series, and defined thresholds trigger closer review.
Precision, honestly stated
What accuracy you can expect
Millimetre-level precision is achievable under favourable conditions — and wrong to promise universally. Achievable precision at your asset depends on:
- Data availability over the asset and period of interest
- Surface characteristics (structures and hard surfaces measure well; vegetation poorly)
- Atmospheric conditions across the image archive
- Viewing geometry relative to the movement direction
- Processing method and parameter choices
- Temporal coverage and acquisition continuity
- Availability of validation data (levelling, GNSS, track geometry)
Every corridor assessment starts with a data availability review that states expected measurement density and precision for your specific network — before you commit to the full analysis. Where satellite measurement is genuinely unsuitable, we say so and suggest alternatives.
Start a conversation
Screen one corridor first
A pilot on a single route or facility establishes measurement density, data quality, and usefulness for your network — typically the fastest way to evaluate the approach.